SHA256
Added mistakes
This commit is contained in:
1 parent
888fe03d46
commit
d7a6f137e6
1 file changed
+21
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
|
|||||||
|
# Practice Exam 3 Mistakes
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
#### A Developer is creating a DynamoDB table for storing application logs. The table has 5 write capacity units (WCUs). The Developer needs to configure the read capacity units (RCUs) for the table. Which of the following configurations represents the most efficient use of throughput?
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- Eventually consistent reads of 5 RCUs reading items that are 4 KB in size
|
||||||
|
x Strongly consistent reads of 5 RCUs reading items that are 4 KB in size
|
||||||
|
- Eventually consistent reads of 15 RCUs reading items that are 1 KB in size
|
||||||
|
- Strongly consistent reads of 15 RCUs reading items that are 1KB in size
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
> [!note] Correct Answer
|
||||||
|
> Eventually consistent reads of 15 RCUs reading items that are 1 KB in size
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
> [!caution] Explanation
|
||||||
|
>Among these options, the most cost-efficient in terms of maximizing the number of read operations per RCU is:
|
||||||
|
>**Eventually consistent reads of 15 RCUs reading items that are 1 KB in size.**
|
||||||
|
>
|
||||||
|
>This choice utilizes the RCU allocation most effectively because:
|
||||||
|
>- It leverages the lower RCU consumption of eventually consistent reads.
|
||||||
|
>- It takes advantage of the smaller item size (1 KB), which requires fewer RCUs for the same number of operations compared to items up to 4 KB.
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
Reference in new issue
Block a user