$WW,1$$IV,1$----11/06/13 00:27:42----$IV,0$ * $TX,"WWW.OSDEV.ORG",HTML="http://www.osdev.org"$ My compiler makes x86_64 machine code, not byte code. Did you not know that a compiler parses and makes an intermediate code data structure? What do you think an optimization stage works on? After optimizing, it converts the intermediate code to output machine code. My compiler makes a stack machine intermediate code. Most compilers make an abstract symbol tree intermediate code. God says... $FG,4$consecrate torrent Thence presuming idols Project contradict prayers feedeth makers hand unexpected fantastic therefrom casting tcosa10 tradition trample dog boastfulness baby museth all begat prolonged witness suppliant citizen whithersoever manners A maintainers advice plunging burnest Sacrifice 1739 hindrance confesseth last avenues satisfying prefer stretched dear$FG$ $IV,1$----11/06/13 09:00:45----$IV,0$ Yeah, I had a bug. Nobody says anything. 100 bad downloads? Reality is broken. God is in control. God says... $FG,4$case citizen reawakened wronging Me docile Am rebuked proceed making Thanks prevented resurrection colouring CAN After spouts butler tone capacities moulded Hope babe Bridal achieve forbid organization Print crept distribution swiftness workmaster faced unhealthiness fixedly list contagion daily comfortest fifty bemoaned iniquity rule throne altered blush verses revolting incredible discovered hurriedly denoted dug blessest remember clothe circles revenge medium penally mutual heavy Me arrogant Will second natural wisely purchase acquire Sacraments preferred Whose wonderful fragrance graceful need early foreshow language verily approved unjust higher voice fore pierce distributed makest details unfailingly equity armed wanting endure exclusions longs$FG$ $IV,1$----11/06/13 11:06:59----$IV,0$ * $TX,"WWW.OSDEV.ORG",HTML="http://www.osdev.org"$ Fucken niggers! My compiler compiles $LK,"HolyC",A="FI:::/Doc/HolyC.TXT"$ to x86_64 machine code. In the C/C++ language, a $FG,2$switch(i){}$FG$ statement checks for bounds on i, normally. Fucken niggers don't even know how it's coded with a jump table. It has to limit bounds to be within the jmp table. Mine has a $FG,2$nobound_switch(i){}$FG$ that does not bound check. God damn, you fucken niggers. $FG,2$U0 Print(...) { I64 i; for (i=0;i